{"name":"lcw","uri":"https://mofpp.ramabile.casa/net/lcw","type":"net","published":true,"provenance":{"source":"mofplus","source_id":"lcw","retrieved":"2026-09-09T00:12:39.308908","licence_source":"MOF++ project decision, CONTEXT §6 (Licensing): MOF+ is this group's own service, so nets retrieved from it are the project's own data to license, and the project licenses its data CC BY 4.0. No third-party grant is claimed.","source_citation":null,"field_sources":{"catenated":"mofplus:name-heuristic","cella":"mofplus","cellalpha":"mofplus","cellb":"mofplus","cellbeta":"mofplus","cellc":"mofplus","cellgamma":"mofplus","cs":"mofplus","edges":"mofplus","natoms":"mofplus","source_id":"mofplus","vertices":"mofplus","vs_placeholder":"class(es) [0]: the source stored a placeholder where the vertex symbol belongs — a string no entry of which names a ring. It is an absence written down, not a symbol, so vs is null for those classes and the stored string is kept only as VertexClass.vs_as_stored. Serving it as a symbol would state something the source did not.","licence":"mofpp-project-decision (CONTEXT §6)","topofile":"mofplus","retrieved_utc":"2026-09-09T00:12:39.308908+00:00","name_match":"single-source","cs_corroboration":"checked: one walk over the net's own periodic topology per vertex class, matched against the sequences the source supplied (0 class(es) disagreed). The coordination sequences are the source's own, byte for byte. Only the question of which vertex class each one describes was settled here, by walking the periodic net from one atom of each class (services.topology.coordination_sequence) and matching that walk against the sequences the source supplied. No sequence was computed into the record, extended, repaired, or replaced by a walked one; a supplied sequence that matches no class is withheld, not corrected."}},"ordering":{"rcsr_index":null,"rcsr_index_provenance":null,"rcsr_index_absence":"outside-archive","rcsr_index_note":"No RCSR index: the name lcw is not one of the 2930 symbols in the RCSR Systre archive of 2019-06-01, so this net has no position in that ordering and is listed after every net that does.","complexity_rank":141,"complexity_basis":{"level":3,"level_name":"cell_contents","fields":{"natoms":6,"edge_count":6},"tie_break":{"symbol":"lcw"},"key":[3,6,6,"lcw"],"unkeyed":false}},"spacegroup":null,"spacegroup_number":null,"transitivity":{"p":null,"q":null,"r":null,"s":null},"cell":[2.0,2.0,2.0,90.0,90.0,90.0],"natoms":6,"catenated":false,"catenated_note":"No, on the MOF+ name heuristic: that source marks a catenated net by a -c in its name, which the legacy client filters on, and this is that marker read back. A name heuristic, not a computed property of the topology, and not a measurement either source made.","licence":"CC-BY-4.0","coordination_sequences":{"state":"corroborated","note":"The mapping of coordination sequences onto vertex classes that the source supplied was checked against a walk over the periodic topology of the net itself, one walk per vertex class, and agreed. The sequences are the values the source supplied; the walk settled nothing but which class each one describes.","provenance":"mofplus","corroboration":"checked: one walk over the net's own periodic topology per vertex class, matched against the sequences the source supplied (0 class(es) disagreed). The coordination sequences are the source's own, byte for byte. Only the question of which vertex class each one describes was settled here, by walking the periodic net from one atom of each class (services.topology.coordination_sequence) and matching that walk against the sequences the source supplied. No sequence was computed into the record, extended, repaired, or replaced by a walked one; a supplied sequence that matches no class is withheld, not corrected.","topology_mismatch":null,"class_mapping":null,"unresolved":null,"vertex_symbols":{"state":"not-recorded","note":"No vertex symbol is recorded for this net. Every symbol below is absent, which is a different fact from a symbol that is blank or unknown, and is why the field is null rather than an empty string.","corroboration":"Not corroborated. The coordination sequences beside these symbols carry a corroboration of their own, stated under coordination_sequences; the vertex symbols carry none. A vertex symbol names the shortest ring at each angle of a vertex, no ring perception runs anywhere in this project, and so there is nothing here that could reproduce one: these strings are served on the word of the source alone. What was checked is their shape — a d-coordinated vertex has d(d-1)/2 angles and a whole symbol names a ring at each, and a string that lists fewer is flagged rather than served as a symbol. A string that passes that count can still be wrong in its rings, and nothing here says otherwise.","provenance":null,"stored":0,"shape_checked":0,"truncated":[],"placeholder":[],"incomplete":[],"flagged":{},"absence_reason":"not recorded: no vertex symbol is stored for this vertex."}},"vertex_symbols":{"state":"not-recorded","note":"No vertex symbol is recorded for this net. Every symbol below is absent, which is a different fact from a symbol that is blank or unknown, and is why the field is null rather than an empty string.","corroboration":"Not corroborated. The coordination sequences beside these symbols carry a corroboration of their own, stated under coordination_sequences; the vertex symbols carry none. A vertex symbol names the shortest ring at each angle of a vertex, no ring perception runs anywhere in this project, and so there is nothing here that could reproduce one: these strings are served on the word of the source alone. What was checked is their shape — a d-coordinated vertex has d(d-1)/2 angles and a whole symbol names a ring at each, and a string that lists fewer is flagged rather than served as a symbol. A string that passes that count can still be wrong in its rings, and nothing here says otherwise.","provenance":null,"stored":0,"shape_checked":0,"truncated":[],"placeholder":[],"incomplete":[],"flagged":{},"absence_reason":"not recorded: no vertex symbol is stored for this vertex."},"systre":{"key":null,"checksum":null,"provenance":null,"checksum_provenance":null,"absence":"outside-archive","note":"No Systre key: the name lcw is not one of the 2930 symbols in the RCSR Systre archive of 2019-06-01, and the MOF+ service supplies no canonical key at all, so neither source we read states one for this net. None is computed here."},"vertices":[{"idx":0,"coordination_number":2,"symmetry":null,"vertex_symbol":null,"vertex_symbol_absence":"not recorded: no vertex symbol is stored for this vertex.","vertex_symbol_as_stored":null,"coordination_sequence":[2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2],"coordination_sequence_absence":null},{"idx":1,"coordination_number":2,"symmetry":null,"vertex_symbol":null,"vertex_symbol_absence":"not recorded: no vertex symbol is stored for this vertex.","vertex_symbol_as_stored":null,"coordination_sequence":[2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2],"coordination_sequence_absence":null},{"idx":2,"coordination_number":2,"symmetry":null,"vertex_symbol":null,"vertex_symbol_absence":"not recorded: no vertex symbol is stored for this vertex.","vertex_symbol_as_stored":null,"coordination_sequence":[2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2],"coordination_sequence_absence":null},{"idx":3,"coordination_number":2,"symmetry":null,"vertex_symbol":null,"vertex_symbol_absence":"not recorded: no vertex symbol is stored for this vertex.","vertex_symbol_as_stored":null,"coordination_sequence":[2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2],"coordination_sequence_absence":null},{"idx":4,"coordination_number":2,"symmetry":null,"vertex_symbol":null,"vertex_symbol_absence":"not recorded: no vertex symbol is stored for this vertex.","vertex_symbol_as_stored":null,"coordination_sequence":[2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2],"coordination_sequence_absence":null},{"idx":5,"coordination_number":2,"symmetry":null,"vertex_symbol":null,"vertex_symbol_absence":"not recorded: no vertex symbol is stored for this vertex.","vertex_symbol_as_stored":null,"coordination_sequence":[2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2],"coordination_sequence_absence":null}],"geometry":{"cell":[[2.0,0.0,0.0],[0.0,2.0,0.0],[0.0,0.0,2.0]],"cellparams":[2.0,2.0,2.0,90.0,90.0,90.0],"boundary_edges":3,"vertices":[{"idx":0,"coord":[0.25,0.5,0.0],"coordination_number":2},{"idx":1,"coord":[0.75,0.5,0.0],"coordination_number":2},{"idx":2,"coord":[0.0,0.25,0.5],"coordination_number":2},{"idx":3,"coord":[0.0,0.75,0.5],"coordination_number":2},{"idx":4,"coord":[0.5,0.0,0.25],"coordination_number":2},{"idx":5,"coord":[0.5,0.0,0.75],"coordination_number":2}],"edges":[{"idx":0,"i":0,"j":1,"image":[-1,0,0],"crosses_boundary":true},{"idx":1,"i":0,"j":1,"image":[0,0,0],"crosses_boundary":false},{"idx":2,"i":2,"j":3,"image":[0,-1,0],"crosses_boundary":true},{"idx":3,"i":2,"j":3,"image":[0,0,0],"crosses_boundary":false},{"idx":4,"i":4,"j":5,"image":[0,0,-1],"crosses_boundary":true},{"idx":5,"i":4,"j":5,"image":[0,0,0],"crosses_boundary":false}]},"files":{"mfpx":"https://mofpp.ramabile.casa/net/lcw.mfpx"},"citation":{"text":"MOF++ contributors (2026). lcw [net]. MOF++ dataset release unreleased. Record: https://mofpp.ramabile.casa/net/lcw","record_uri":"https://mofpp.ramabile.casa/net/lcw","dataset_doi":null,"dataset_version":"unreleased","licence":{"id":"CC-BY-4.0","name":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","short":"CC BY 4.0","open":true}},"relations":{"derived_from":[],"derives":[]}}