MOF++

Data › Nets › nta

Net topology

nta

Ingested production record from rcsr+mofplus. Per-field provenance in field_sources.

JSON · mfpx

36 vertices and 54 edges in the unit cell. 18 of them leave the cell and continue into a neighbouring one; those are drawn in the accent colour and end at a hollow node. Squares are vertices of coordination 5 or more, circles of 4 or fewer. Drag to rotate, or focus the figure and use the arrow keys.

Crystallographic description

Spacegroup
not recorded
Cell lengths
a = 4.4214 Å, b = 4.4214 Å, c = 5.9831 Å
Cell angles
α = 90.00°, β = 90.00°, γ = 120.00°
Atoms in cell
36
Transitivity pqrs
not recorded
Catenated
no
No, on the MOF+ name heuristic: that source marks a catenated net by a -c in its name, which the legacy client filters on, and this is that marker read back. A name heuristic, not a computed property of the topology, and not a measurement either source made.

Canonical key

Systre key
3 1 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 3 6 1 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 4 5 0 1 0 4 8 0 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 7 10 0 0 1 7 11 0 0 0 8 9 1 1 -1 8 12 0 0 0 9 11 -1 -1 0 10 12 -1 -1 0 11 12 -1 0 1
(rcsr)The canonical Systre key, copied verbatim from the local RCSR Systre archive of 2019-06-01. It is not computed here and cannot be: no Gavrog/Systre toolchain runs on this machine, so nothing on this site derives, extends, repairs or verifies a key. The checksum served beside it is the one the archive itself carries, copied from the same block, so that this copy can be checked against the upstream file; no checksum is computed or verified here.
Checksum
653fa80f2319f84025889f7fb3be63d2 (rcsr)

Vertices

The mapping of coordination sequences onto vertex classes that the source supplied was checked against a walk over the periodic topology of the net itself, one walk per vertex class, and agreed. The sequences are the values the source supplied; the walk settled nothing but which class each one describes.

Not corroborated. The coordination sequences beside these symbols carry a corroboration of their own, stated under coordination_sequences; the vertex symbols carry none. A vertex symbol names the shortest ring at each angle of a vertex, no ring perception runs anywhere in this project, and so there is nothing here that could reproduce one: these strings are served on the word of the source alone. What was checked is their shape — a d-coordinated vertex has d(d-1)/2 angles and a whole symbol names a ring at each, and a string that lists fewer is flagged rather than served as a symbol. A string that passes that count can still be wrong in its rings, and nothing here says otherwise.

One row per distinct vertex. The coordination sequence counts how many vertices lie at each topological distance; the vertex symbol names the shortest ring at each angle of the vertex. The two columns do not carry the same warrant: which of them was corroborated, and which was not, is stated above the table.
# Coordination Site symmetry Vertex symbol Coordination sequence
0 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
1 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
2 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
3 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
4 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
5 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
6 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
7 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
8 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
9 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
10 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
11 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
12 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
13 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
14 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
15 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
16 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
17 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 72 97 120 152
18 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
19 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
20 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
21 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
22 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
23 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
24 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
25 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
26 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
27 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
28 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
29 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
30 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
31 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
32 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
33 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
34 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149
35 3 —9(2).9(2).9(2)3 6 12 24 36 53 74 96 119 149

Provenance

Source
rcsr+mofplus — reconciled from both, field by field
Identifier at the source
nta
Retrieved
2026-09-09
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — verified from MOF++ project decision, CONTEXT §6 (Licensing): MOF+ is this group's own service, so nets retrieved from it are the project's own data to license, and the project licenses its data CC BY 4.0. No third-party grant is claimed..
Published
yes

Position in the collection

RCSR index
1458 (derived) Derived by this site, not published by RCSR: the 1-based position of the symbol in the ascending ASCII-lexicographic ordering of the 2930 symbols in the RCSR Systre archive of 2019-06-01. RCSR does not number its nets; this is our ordering of their symbols and nothing more.
Complexity rank
1612 The order the ingest processed this net in, simplest first. A different number from the RCSR index above, meaning a different thing.